Mac vs. PC… Good question? Not really.
It’s not often that I write letters to officials, news stations, or any of those things, but tonight was my one for the year (or so). Our local NBC station has a segment called Good Question on the 10:00 news, and tonight’s segment that attempted to solve the Mac vs. PC debate was just shoddy, lazy, reporting. Here was my e-mail to the station:
I was rather disappointed to watch your recent segment on the Mac vs. PC debate. Although all points were valid, I felt that they were presented in a way that was slightly misleading.Point 1: Yes, there are Macs that cost upwards of $3000 or more. However, the Mac Pro is a very high powered machine that is built with video and audio editors in mind. The average viewer of your segment would mostly be using their computer for e-mail and Internet surfing, which the $499 mac mini is more than suitable (and within the price range of a comparable PC). Even if they went for an iMac, the most they’d pay is $1800.
Point 2: Graphic Design? I’m a designer at one of the top advertising agencies in town, and even though I am a Mac user (I switched from PC in Fall 2005), the PC versions of all the design programs I use are exactly the same. This is kind of a cop out.
Point 3: This is really the only point in the entire battle that has no real counterpoint. You can’t argue numbers like that.
Point 4: Downtime? I personally have only had any Mac freeze up a handful of times, but it should be pointed out that ALL computers crash, no matter the operating system. That’s just a fact of life. I could argue however that a PC freezes far more often than Mac… the main reason I switched platforms.Finally, I bring up the point that was unfortunately missed in your report. I am writing this email from a Macbook laptop, which is capable of running Mac OS X and Windows XP… a feat that no PC on the market can do without illegal software hacking.
The fact of the matter is that it’s not a draw, but there’s no clear winner either… only because each computer platform serves people in different ways, and that’s just how it should be. A Mac is not for everyone just as a PC is the same. I’d love for everyone to use Macs, but for some people cost or perceived lack of software is a deal breaker.
I should also point out that I’m not trying to start a platform war here… Those are more lame and awful than the segment itself. I’m just pointing out that their research and delivery of the information was lackluster on both sides of the issue.