AT&T bids farewell to Saul Bass icon

If you weren’t aware, SBC recently purchased AT&T, and along with the changes and improvements that they are making to the company, they have decided to do away with the 1984 logo that Saul Bass designed.

I’ll leave discussion of the aesthetics of the new mark for the comments section, but as discussion fodder I will share the rationale from the official press release:

“The revitalized mark symbolizes these attributes ââ¬â innovation, integrity, quality, reliability and unsurpassed customer care,” Whitacre added. “Our customers know that we’re focused on keeping our promises, committed to operating honestly, and dedicated to bringing them new products that make a difference in their lives.”

The new logo reinvigorates the AT&T globe ââ¬â one of the most recognized corporate symbols in the world. The new globe is three-dimensional, representing the expanding breadth and depth of services that the new AT&T family of companies provides to customers, as well as its global presence.

Transparency was added to the globe to represent clarity and vision. Lowercase type is now used for the “AT&T” characters because it projects a more welcoming and accessible image. The core of the new logo remains blue because both the SBC and AT&T brands are strongly associated with that color. The overall design more accurately represents the company that is leading the industry in delivering best-in-class services to consumers and business professionals.

Given that rationale, the question is: Does this new logo truly communicate those objectives? Discuss.

If you want to research and have some ammunition for your critique, you can look at a PDF of the evolution of the SBC/AT&T logo.

Previously:
 
  • I just don’t think SBC can make a smart marketing decision. They got rid of the great Pacific Bell brand and replaced it with SBC, a company up to that point I had never heard of. And AT&T wireless had a horrible reputation before it got rolled into Cingular.

  • I read about their decision to abolish the Cingular brand after posting this today, and I also have to wonder what their marketing team is smoking. To me, the worst part about the whole thing is that they’re not assimilating the Cingular brand entirely. Apparently, there will still be some markets that SBC will continue to sell wireless services under the Cingular name. So, why (especially given the amount of money and effort used to fold AT&T Wireless into the Cingular brand) would they backtrack and reverse all this work only partially? Either you’re Cingular or you’re AT&T Wireless. Make up your mind!


    As an aside, their service doesn’t matter to me much anyway, as my time as a Cingular customer was some of the worst in my cellular/wireless history.


    And incidentally, I can’t decide whether I like the new logo or not. Lots of things about it make me not want to like it, but the more I think about it in terms of the rationale, it’s at least starting to make sense, even though I think some of the points of the rationale are weak at best.

  • They already spent bling to incororate (shove?) AT&T Wireless branding into the Cingular logo & brand. Now, they are doing away Cingular’s brand. I truly think not only will it cost way more bling, but also seriously detract from Cingular’s target demographic. Maybe they’ll attract more boomers, but there not the ones who purchase data plans I’d wager.

blog comments powered by Disqus